133r. Review Evaluating and Comparing Algebraic Expressions
Learning Intentions
- Substitute values to Evaluate algebraic expressions
- To understand what it means for two expressions to be equivalent
- To understand how the commutative and associative laws for arithmetic can be used to Determine equivalence
- show that two expressions are not equivalent Use substitution
Pre-requisite Summary
- Know that a pronumeral or variable stands for a number
- Be able to replace a pronumeral with a given value
- Understand that multiplication may be written without the
sign, for example - Know the difference between an expression and an equation
- Recall the commutative law for addition and multiplication
- Recall the associative law for addition and multiplication
- Be able to evaluate numerical expressions accurately
- Understand that equivalent expressions always have the same value for the same substitution
Worked Examples
Worked Example 1
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a) Solve
b) Find
c) Find
Worked Example 2
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a) Find
b) Find
c) Find
Worked Example 3
Decide whether each pair of expressions is equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Worked Example 4
Use the commutative or associative law to show that the expressions are equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Worked Example 5
Use substitution to show that two expressions are not equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Worked Example 6
For each pair, decide whether the expressions are equivalent. Use a law if possible, or substitution if needed:
a)
b)
c)
Problems
Problem 1
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a) Find
b) Find
c) Find
Problem 2
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a) Find
b) Find
c) Find
Problem 3
Decide whether each pair of expressions is equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Problem 4
Use the commutative or associative law to show that the expressions are equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Problem 5
Use substitution to show that two expressions are not equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Problem 6
For each pair, decide whether the expressions are equivalent. Use a law if possible, or substitution if needed:
a)
b)
c)
Problems
Understanding and Fluency
Exercise 1.
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 2.
Substitute the given value and evaluate:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 3.
Decide whether each pair of expressions is equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 4.
Decide whether each pair of expressions is equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 5.
Use the commutative or associative law to justify equivalence:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 6.
Use substitution to show that the expressions are not equivalent:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 7.
For each pair, decide whether the expressions are equivalent. Use a law or substitution:
a)
b)
c)
Exercise 8.
Evaluate both expressions for the same substitution:
a)
b)
c)
Reasoning
Exercise 9.
Explain what it means for two expressions to be equivalent.
Exercise 10.
A student says that
Exercise 11.
Noah says that if two expressions give the same value for one substitution, then they must be equivalent. Is he correct? Explain.
Exercise 12.
Explain how the commutative law can be used to show that
Exercise 13.
A student says that
Problem-solving
Exercise 14.
A taxi fare can be written as
Exercise 15.
Two students write the total number of apples as
Exercise 16.
A pattern rule is written as
Exercise 17.
A builder writes the total length as
Exercise 18.
A shop writes one total cost as
Exercise 19.
A student claims that
Potential Misunderstandings
- Students may think two expressions are equivalent if they look similar
- Students may think two expressions are equivalent if they use the same variables and numbers
- Students may confuse evaluating an expression with solving an equation
- Students may substitute a value into one expression correctly but not the other
- Students may forget that multiplication is implied in expressions such as
- Students may think the commutative law applies to subtraction in the same way as addition
- Students may think the associative law changes the order of terms, rather than the grouping
- Students may believe that matching one substitution is enough to prove equivalence
- Students may not Recognise that one counterexample is enough to show two expressions are not equivalent