Lesson 96 — Problem Solving and Consolidation: Modelling with Ratios and Rates
Strand: Measurement | Descriptor: AC9M8M07 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To consolidate the full mathematical modelling cycle — formulate, solve, interpret, review — applied to a ratio or rate problem in a financial context.
- To carry out an independent modelling task from a real-world prompt through to a communicated, reviewed solution.
Success Criteria
I can:
- Formulate a mathematical model from a real-world ratio or rate scenario.
- Solve the model accurately, using an appropriate strategy.
- Interpret the solution in a full sentence, with correct units and sensible rounding.
- Review the model’s assumptions and refine it where appropriate.
Warmup
(5 minutes — “name the stage”, whole class rapid-fire)
For each statement below, name which stage of the modelling cycle it belongs to: Formulate, Solve, Interpret, or Review.
- “Let
= cost in dollars. Then .” - ”
.” - “The total cost is
49.00 600$ MB of data.” - “This assumes the flat fee never changes — is that realistic over a
-month contract?”
Answers: 1. Formulate. 2. Solve. 3. Interpret. 4. Review.
Teacher note: This warmup is the whole lesson in miniature — today students will move through all four stages independently on a new scenario.
Activities
Activity 1 — Guided Consolidation: a Full Modelling Cycle together (10 min)
Whole class, teacher scaffolds each stage explicitly, moving quickly since all four stages have been taught across Lessons 92–95.
Scenario: “A school is catering a formal dinner for
Formulate (I do): Let
Solve (We do): Together substitute
Interpret (We do): Together write the sentence: “For
Review (You do, pairs, 3 min): Discuss and note down: what assumption might make this comparison unreliable? (E.g. guest numbers might change closer to the date; Caterer 1’s per-guest rate might not include drinks, while Caterer 2’s flat fee might.)
Activity 2 — Independent Modelling Task: Choose Your Scenario (16 min)
Individually or in pairs. Choose one of the three scenarios below and complete a full four-stage modelling cycle in your workbook, clearly labelling each stage: Formulate, Solve, Interpret, Review.
Scenario A — Best buy. A
Scenario B — Wages. A casual employee earns
Scenario C — Currency and travel. A family converts
Minimum requirements for each stage:
- Formulate: state knowns, unknowns (with variable names), the relationship (ratio/rate), and at least one assumption.
- Solve: full working, correctly laid out.
- Interpret: a complete sentence with correct units and sensible rounding.
- Review: judge your assumption’s reasonableness, and state one refinement.
Activity 3 — Problem-solving Extension: Comparing Two Models (14 min)
Pairs. For early finishers or as the main task for stronger pairs — a genuine comparison problem requiring all four stages twice.
A gym offers two membership options. Option A:
18 $65 3$ times per week.
Formulate, solve, interpret and review both options, then answer: at what number of monthly visits do the two options cost the same? Which option should the student choose, and why?
Socratic scaffolding:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Understand: what are the two separate models here? | |
| Devise a plan: how do you find where two models are equal? | Set |
| Carry it out | |
| Interpret | Round appropriately — what does a fractional “visit” mean here? |
| Looking back — apply to the student’s actual situation | At |
Since
Checks for Understanding
(6 minutes — exit ticket, collected)
- Formulate: A taxi charges a
4.20 $2.10 c n$ km. - Solve: Find the cost of a
km trip using your equation from Q1. - Interpret: Write your answer to Q2 as a full sentence.
- Review. State one assumption in the taxi model, and judge whether it is reasonable for a trip through heavy traffic.
Answers: 1.
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| Skipping the Formulate stage and jumping straight to a calculation. | Require all four stages to be visibly labelled in every response today. |
| Treating “Interpret” as just repeating the number with units, without a full sentence answering the original question. | Model the difference between " |
| Believing “Review” is optional or just a formality. | Require a stated assumption and a stated refinement, not just “this model might be wrong”. |
| Comparing two models only at the values given, without checking a break-even point. | Model that “for this many visits/guests/hours, which is cheaper?” is often a more complete answer, when time allows. |
| Losing track of variable meanings partway through a multi-scenario lesson. | Insist on a defined-variable list at the start of every Formulate stage. |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (AMC Junior style). Two market stalls sell apples. Stall A:
Answer
Options:
E2 (Kangaroo style). A model states “a photocopier printing at a constant rate of
Answer
The assumption is reasonable as a first approximation, but a careful reviewer would add: paper jams, warm-up time, or pauses to refill the paper tray for a
E3 (Challenge). A comparison of two mobile plans finds they cost the same at
Answer
The break-even point acts as a decision rule: a user can estimate whether their typical usage is reliably above or below
Homework
- Formulate: A market stall sells honey at
14 500 $32 1.2 100$ g) formula for each jar size. - Solve: Calculate both unit prices from Q1 and state which jar is the better buy.
- Interpret: Write your Q2 answer as a full recommendation sentence.
- Review: State one assumption behind the Q1 model (e.g. about jar quality or use-by dates) and judge its reasonableness.
- A full modelling task: a family is choosing between two electricity plans. Plan X:
c per kWh, no daily charge. Plan Y: c per day plus c per kWh. Complete all four stages (formulate, solve for a household using kWh/day, interpret, review) in your workbook. - Reasoning. Explain why the “review” stage of a model is especially important in financial contexts, where a poor assumption could lead to a costly real decision.
- Challenge. A comparison of two paid options has one with a flat fee and one with a purely usage-based rate. Prove algebraically that there is always exactly one break-even usage value (assuming the usage-based rate is higher than the per-unit rate of the flat-fee option), by setting up and solving
against in general terms, where .
Answers: 1.