Lesson 61 — Problem-Solving: Proving Congruence and Similarity
Strand: Space | Descriptor: AC9M8SP01 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To construct a structured, reasoned proof that two triangles are congruent using SSS, SAS, AAS or RHS.
- To use similar triangles to solve indirect-measurement problems.
Success Criteria
I can:
- Select and justify the correct congruence condition to prove two triangles congruent.
- Write a proof as a sequence of statements, each supported by a reason.
- Use similarity (AA) to set up and solve a scale-factor problem in an applied context.
- Use a congruence proof to derive a new geometric fact (e.g. that base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal).
Warmup
(5 minutes — “Spot the condition”, mini whiteboards)
For each pair of marked triangles, decide: SSS, SAS, AAS, RHS, or not enough information.
- Two triangles share three pairs of equal sides.
- Two triangles share two equal sides and the angle between them.
- Two triangles share two equal angles and a non-included equal side.
- Two right-angled triangles share the hypotenuse and one other side.
- Two triangles share two equal sides and a non-included angle. (Trap.)
- Two triangles share three equal angles. (Trap.)
Answers: 1. SSS 2. SAS 3. AAS 4. RHS 5. Not enough information — SSA is not a valid condition; the triangle is not fixed. 6. Not enough information for congruence — AAA only guarantees the triangles are similar, not the same size.
Teacher note: Questions 5 and 6 are deliberate traps. Push students to sketch a counterexample for each before accepting “not enough information.”
Activities
Activity 1 — Explicit Instruction: Proving the Isosceles Triangle Theorem (12 min)
I do: Model a formal proof, statement by statement, using a labelled diagram of
Claim: The base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal, i.e.
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Given (isosceles triangle) | |
| Given ( | |
| Common side | |
| SAS | |
| Corresponding angles in congruent triangles |
We do: Extend the same diagram. Since
You do: Using the same congruent triangles, prove that
Activity 2 — Similar Triangles for Indirect Measurement (10 min)
I do: A flagpole casts a shadow
We do: A
You do: A mirror is placed on the ground
Activity 3 — Problem-solving: a Formal Proof (12 min)
Pairs, then whole-class share.
Line segments
and bisect each other at (that is, and ). Prove that .
Socratic scaffolding (Polya’s cycle):
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Understand: what are you given, and what must you show? | Given: |
| What do equal angles at | |
| Devise a plan — can you find two congruent triangles? | Look at |
| Carry out the plan — which condition applies? | |
| What does the congruence give you? | |
| How does an angle fact prove parallel lines? | |
| Looking back — does this match a shape you know? | This is exactly why the diagonals of a parallelogram bisecting each other forces opposite sides to be parallel — a preview of Lesson 63. |
Full proof:
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| Given | |
| Vertically opposite angles | |
| SAS | |
| Corresponding angles in congruent triangles | |
| Equal alternate angles on transversal |
Checks for Understanding
(6 minutes — exit ticket, collected)
- State the congruence condition proved by: two triangles with two equal angles and the side between them equal.
- In
, and is bisected by ( on ). Name the congruence condition that proves . - A
m student casts a m shadow. A building casts a m shadow at the same time. How tall is the building? - Why is “SSA” not accepted as a valid congruence condition?
- Reasoning. Two triangles have all three angles equal. Explain why this does not prove the triangles are congruent, and state what it does prove.
Answers: 1. ASA; 2. SAS; 3.
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| SSA is treated as a valid congruence condition. | Sketch two different triangles satisfying the same SSA data side by side — a concrete counterexample. |
| AAA proves congruence. | Contrast with a photocopy enlarged to 150%: same angles, different size. AAA only proves similarity. |
| Any correspondence order is acceptable when naming congruent triangles. | Insist |
| A proof is “just the diagram” — no statements needed. | Require every proof to be written as statement–reason pairs, even in rough working. |
| In similar-triangle problems, students match the wrong sides in the ratio. | Always write the ratio with corresponding sides stacked directly above one another before solving. |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (AMC Junior style). Two triangles are congruent by SAS. One has sides
Answer
E2 (Kangaroo style). A tree of unknown height casts a shadow of
Answer
E3 (Challenge proof).
Answer
Consider
Homework
- State the condition (SSS, SAS, AAS, RHS) that proves each pair of triangles congruent: (a) three matching sides (b) two right-angled triangles with equal hypotenuse and one equal leg (c) two angles and the included side equal.
- A
m man casts a m shadow. At the same time a flagpole casts a m shadow. Find the height of the flagpole. is isosceles with . The bisector of meets at . Name the two congruent triangles formed and the condition that proves them congruent. - Two triangles have two pairs of equal sides and a pair of equal angles that is not between those sides. Can you conclude they are congruent? Sketch to justify your answer.
- Reasoning. Explain, using a diagram, why AA is sufficient to prove two triangles are similar even though only two of the three angles are checked.
- Challenge.
is the midpoint of . and are points on opposite sides of such that and . Prove that .
Answers: 1. (a) SSS (b) RHS (c) ASA; 2.