Lesson 58 — Conditions for Similar Triangles: Guided Practice
Strand: Space | Descriptor: AC9M8SP01 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To understand that similar triangles have the same shape (equal corresponding angles, proportional corresponding sides) but not necessarily the same size.
- To identify similar triangles using AA, SAS~ (two sides in ratio with the included angle equal) and SSS~ (three sides in the same ratio).
Success Criteria
I can:
- State the three conditions for triangle similarity: AA, SAS~, SSS~.
- Correctly match corresponding sides and angles between two similar triangles.
- Calculate a scale factor between similar triangles and use it to find an unknown side.
- Distinguish between conditions that prove similarity only and those that prove congruence.
Warmup
(5 minutes — quick judgement, mini whiteboards)
Recall Lesson 57. For each pair, decide: congruent, similar (not congruent), or neither.
- Sides
and sides . - Sides
and sides . - Angles
in both, with no side lengths given. - Sides
and sides .
Answers: 1. Congruent — SSS; 2. Similar, not congruent — sides in constant ratio
Discussion: “Q2 introduced today’s idea precisely: same shape, different size — a photocopier enlargement. Today we pin down exactly what conditions guarantee similarity.”
Activities
Activity 1 — Explicit Instruction: AA and SAS~ (12 min)
I do — AA (Angle-Angle): if two pairs of corresponding angles are equal, the triangles are similar. Why is this enough? Because the third angle is automatically equal too (angle sum
I do — SAS~ (Side-Angle-Side, similarity version): if two pairs of corresponding sides are in the same ratio, and the included angle is equal, the triangles are similar. Model:
Since the ratios match and the included angle is equal,
We do: Together,
You do:
: , , . : , , . State the condition and scale factor. : , . : , . Are they similar? Justify using all three angles.
Activity 2 — Explicit Instruction: SSS~ and Guided Practice Matching Correspondence (12 min)
I do — SSS~ (three sides in the same ratio): if all three pairs of corresponding sides are in the same ratio, the triangles are similar — no angle information is needed. Key technique: order each triangle’s sides from smallest to largest before comparing ratios, so you don’t accidentally compare non-corresponding sides.
Model:
We do: Together, test
You do — guided matching practice:
- Given
, with , , : if , , and , find and . - Test whether
(sides ) and (sides ) are similar by SSS~. - Test whether
(sides ) and (sides ) are similar, and state the scale factor.
Activity 3 — Inquiry Task: the Overlapping Triangles Problem (11 min)
Pairs, then whole-class share.
In the diagram,
and share vertex , with on and on , and . Given , , , explain why , and find and the scale factor.
Socratic scaffolding:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Understand: what does | Corresponding angles on the parallel lines are equal: |
| What angle do both triangles already share? | |
| Devise a plan — which similarity condition applies? | Two equal angles ( |
| What is | |
| Carry out the plan for | |
| Looking back — does the answer make sense? |
Checks for Understanding
(5 minutes — exit ticket, collected)
- State the condition that proves two triangles similar when only angle information is given.
has sides . has sides . State the condition, the scale factor, and whether the triangles are congruent. has , , . has , , . State the condition and find the scale factor. - Reasoning. Explain why AA is sufficient to prove similarity even though only two of the three angles are actually checked.
Answers: 1. AA; 2. SSS~, scale factor
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| Matching sides in the wrong order when computing a ratio. | Always order each triangle’s sides smallest-to-largest before comparing (Activity 2’s key technique). |
| Believing AA alone is not “enough” information because a third angle wasn’t checked. | Explicitly derive the third angle using the angle sum every time, to show it is automatically fixed. |
| Confusing the direction of the scale factor (big ÷ small vs small ÷ big). | Always state which triangle is being mapped to which before dividing, and label the scale factor’s direction. |
| Assuming SSS~ requires equal sides, not just proportional sides. | Contrast explicitly with SSS (congruence), where sides must be equal, versus SSS~, where sides must be in a constant ratio. |
| Treating “similar” as a vague, informal word rather than a precise mathematical claim. | Require every claim of similarity to be backed by a named condition (AA, SAS~ or SSS~) and the matching ratio or angles. |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (AMC Junior style). Two similar triangles have corresponding sides in the ratio
Answer
E2 (Kangaroo style).
Answer
E3 (Challenge). In the overlapping-triangles configuration from Activity 3, suppose instead
Answer
Homework
- State the condition (AA, SAS~, SSS~) that proves each pair of triangles similar: (a) two matching angles only (b) three sides in the same ratio (c) two sides in the same ratio with the included angle equal.
has sides . has sides . Test whether they are similar using SSS~, and state the scale factor if so. has , . has , . Find the missing angle in each triangle and decide whether the triangles are similar. with , , . Given , , , find . - Reasoning. Explain why two equilateral triangles of any size are always similar, but explain what extra information would be needed to also prove them congruent.
- Challenge.
sits inside with on , on , and . If , , and the area of is , use the scale factor to find the area of . (Hint: area scales with the square of the side ratio.)
Answers: 1. (a) AA (b) SSS~ (c) SAS~; 2. Ratios