Lesson 11 — Identifying Terminating and Recurring Decimals
Strand: Number | Descriptor: AC9M8N03 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To use digital tools to convert fractions to decimals and classify the result as terminating or recurring.
- To understand why the denominator of a fraction, written in simplest form, determines whether its decimal terminates or recurs.
Success Criteria
I can:
- Use a calculator to convert a fraction to a decimal.
- Classify a decimal as terminating or recurring from its calculator display, without being fooled by rounding.
- State the prime factorisation rule that predicts whether a fraction terminates.
- Predict, without dividing, whether a given fraction will terminate or recur.
Warmup
(5 minutes — calculator round, pairs)
Convert each fraction to a decimal on your calculator and write down exactly what appears on the screen:
Sort your five results into two groups. What rule are you using to sort them?
Discussion: Most students will separate “decimals that stop” from “decimals that keep going”. Flag question 3 and 5 for a closer look — some calculators show
Activities
Activity 1 — Explicit Instruction: what is the Calculator Really Showing Us? (10 min)
I do / We do / You do.
I do: Perform long division for
The remainder hits 0, so the division stops exactly:
Now perform
The remainder returns to 1, a remainder we have already seen — so the digit
Key idea: A calculator screen only has room for 8–10 digits. When it shows
We do: As a class, perform long division for
You do: Use long division to classify
Activity 2 — Guided Practice: the Prime Factorisation Rule (10 min)
I do: Write each denominator (fraction already in simplest form) as a product of primes.
Rule: A fraction in simplest form terminates if and only if the prime factorisation of its denominator contains only 2s and/or 5s. Any other prime factor (3, 7, 11, 13, …) forces the decimal to recur.
We do: Complete this table together, factorising each denominator before deciding.
| Fraction | Denominator factorised | Terminates or recurs? |
|---|---|---|
| Terminates | ||
| Recurs | ||
| Terminates | ||
| Recurs | ||
| Terminates |
Note
You do: Without dividing, predict whether each fraction terminates or recurs, giving the prime factorisation as evidence:
Activity 3 — Inquiry: the Trap of Unsimplified Fractions (14 min)
Pairs, then whole-class share.
Give students
A student factorises
and predicts recurs. The calculator shows . What went wrong with the prediction?
Let pairs investigate, then formalise: the rule only works on the simplified denominator.
Extend with a harder case:
Socratic scaffolding for pairs who are unsure how to proceed:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| What are you trying to find out? | Whether |
| What do you know about the rule? | It only applies once the fraction cannot be simplified further. |
| Can you find a common factor of 21 and 35? | Both are divisible by |
| What is the simplified fraction? | |
| Now factorise the new denominator | |
| So what do you conclude? | It terminates. Check with a calculator: |
| Looking back — why did the unsimplified form look misleading? |
Finish with a whole-class list-building task: as a group, find five fractions between
Checks for Understanding
(6 minutes — exit ticket, collected)
- Use long division to show whether
terminates or recurs. - Without dividing, predict whether
terminates or recurs. Justify using prime factorisation. - A calculator shows
. Explain why this display does not prove the decimal terminates. - Simplify
first, then predict whether it terminates or recurs.
Answers: 1. Remainders
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| ”The calculator screen stopped, so the decimal terminates.” | Explicitly compare |
| Applying the prime factorisation rule to the unsimplified denominator. | Insist on the instruction “simplify first, factorise second” every time, as in Activity 3. |
| ”A prime denominator always means recurring.” | Contrast |
| Believing recurring decimals are “random” digits that never repeat exactly. | Show the remainder cycle in long division returning to a value already seen — this is what forces the exact repetition. |
| Thinking a decimal with many digits shown must be recurring. | Show |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (AMC Junior style). How many of the fractions
Answer
Terminating denominators (only 2s and 5s):
E2 (Kangaroo style). A fraction
Answer
Check denominators from 20 downward for “only 2s and 5s”:
E3 (Challenge). Find the smallest whole number
Answer
We need
E4 (Investigation). Explain why
Answer
Multiply top and bottom so the denominator becomes
Homework
- Use long division to classify each as terminating or recurring: (a)
(b) (c) . - Without dividing, predict terminating or recurring, showing the prime factorisation of each denominator: (a)
(b) (c) (d) . - Simplify first, then predict: (a)
(b) (c) . - A student says: ”
must terminate because 13 is a small number.” Explain the error in this reasoning. - Reasoning. Explain, in your own words, why multiplying the numerator and denominator of a fraction by the same number never changes whether the decimal terminates or recurs, even though it can change how the factorisation looks mid-working (before simplifying).
- Challenge. List every value of
from 1 to 30 for which terminates. How many are there?
Answers: Q1 — (a) terminates,