Lesson 57 — Representing Rational Numbers on a Number Line
Strand: Number | Descriptor: AC9M7N04 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To represent rational numbers, including negatives, on a number line.
- To use the number line to compare and order rational numbers.
Success Criteria
I can:
- Choose a sensible scale for a number line.
- Place fractions, decimals and percentages accurately on a number line.
- Place negative rational numbers correctly.
- Find a rational number lying between any two given numbers.
Warmup
(6 minutes — estimate the position, mini whiteboards)
A number line runs from
- Roughly where does
sit? How do you know? - Where does
sit? - Where does
sit? Is it the same place as ? - Where does
sit? - Which is further right:
or ?
Answers: 1. Exactly halfway; 2. A quarter of the way along, halfway between
Activities
Activity 1 — Explicit Instruction: Choosing a Scale (12 min)
The core skill. Before plotting anything, decide what one interval on your line will represent.
The three-step method:
- Find the range — the smallest and largest numbers you must show.
- Choose an interval that divides the range sensibly and suits the denominators involved.
- Label every mark, not just the ends.
I do — plotting
- Range: all lie between
and . - Denominators involved:
, , and decimals to two places. The lowest common denominator of and is , but and need tenths and hundredths. - Convert everything to decimals first:
, , , . - Use a line from
to marked in tenths, and estimate between marks.
The general strategy to state: when a set mixes forms, convert to decimals before plotting. Decimals map directly onto a tenths-and-hundredths scale.
We do — plot on a line from
As decimals:
Note:
You do — plot each set on a suitable line:
, , , (line to ) , , , (line to )
Activity 2 — Negative Rational Numbers (12 min)
Combines Lesson 11’s integer line with this lesson’s fractions.
The principle. Negative rationals sit to the left of zero, mirroring their positives.
The ordering trap — address it head on. With negatives, the larger the absolute value, the further left the number sits.
This mirrors the integer misconception from Lesson 11 exactly:
I do. Order from smallest to largest:
As decimals:
You do — order each set:
, , , , , , , , , ,
(Answers: 1.
Activity 3 — Inquiry: Numbers in between (10 min)
Pairs.
- Find a fraction between
and . - Find a fraction between
and your answer to Q1. - Keep going. When do you have to stop?
- How many rational numbers lie between
and ?
Socratic scaffolding:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Understand: what does “between” require? | A number larger than one and smaller than the other. |
| What is an easy way to find one? | Convert to decimals and pick something in the gap: |
| Can you do it with fractions directly? | Use a common denominator: |
| Another method? | The mean: |
| Now repeat between | |
| And again? | |
| So when do you stop? | Never. There is always another number in between. |
| Looking back | Infinitely many rationals lie between any two rationals — no matter how close. |
Answers: 1. e.g.
Contrast to draw out. Between the integers
Checks for Understanding
(5 minutes — exit ticket)
- Place these on a line from
to : , , , . - Order from smallest to largest:
, , , . - Find a fraction between
and . - Reasoning. Explain why
is smaller than . - How many rational numbers lie between
and ?
Answers: 1.
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| Believing | Convert to decimals and locate both on the line. Position decides, not size of digits. |
| Placing equal numbers written differently at different points. | |
| Spacing marks unevenly on a hand-drawn line. | Use a ruler and equal intervals. An inaccurate line gives wrong conclusions. |
| Thinking there is a “next” fraction after | The density inquiry disproves this. |
| Placing | |
| Assuming a percentage over |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (Kangaroo style). Which of these lies closest to
Answer
Distances from
E2 (AMC Junior style). What fraction lies exactly halfway between
Answer
(Check:
E3 (Challenge). On a number line from
Answer
E4 (Challenge). Find three different fractions between
Answer
Scale up:
E5 (Reasoning challenge). Explain why there is no “smallest positive fraction”.
Answer
Given any positive fraction, halving it gives a smaller positive fraction. Since this can always be done, no smallest one exists. Contrast with the positive integers, where
Homework
- Draw a number line from
to marked in tenths, and plot: , , , , . - Draw a number line from
to marked in halves, and plot: , , , , . - Order from smallest to largest: (a)
, , , (b) , , , (c) , , , . - Find a fraction between: (a)
and (b) and (c) and . - Find the number exactly halfway between: (a)
and (b) and (c) and . - Which is further from zero: (a)
or (b) or ? - Reasoning. Explain why
is greater than , using a number line. - Reasoning. Explain why there are infinitely many rational numbers between
and . - Challenge. Find three fractions between
and .
Answers: Q3 — (a)