Lesson 34 — Verifying Solutions by Substitution
Strand: Algebra | Descriptor: AC9M7A03 | Duration: 45 minutes
Learning Intentions
- To verify the solution of a linear equation by substitution.
- To use verification to locate and correct errors in algebraic working.
Success Criteria
I can:
- Substitute a proposed solution into both sides of an equation and compare.
- State clearly whether a value is or is not the solution.
- Find the step at which an error was made in someone’s working.
- Explain why verification is a reliable check.
Warmup
(6 minutes — true or false, mini whiteboards)
Decide whether each statement is true, showing your substitution.
solves solves solves solves
Answers: 1. True —
Activities
Activity 1 — Explicit Instruction: the Verification Protocol (10 min)
Why verify? Solving is a chain of steps; a single slip anywhere gives a wrong answer that looks finished. Substitution tests the answer against the original problem, independently of how you got there.
The protocol — evaluate each side separately, then compare.
I do. Is
So
Setting out to insist on. Label LHS and RHS. Evaluate each on its own line. Never write a chain that assumes the answer is correct — that is circular.
I do — a value that fails. Is
So
We do: Verify each.
- Is
the solution to ? - Is
the solution to ? - Is
the solution to ?
(Answers: 1. Yes,
Activity 2 — Error Hunting (14 min)
The core activity. Students find not just that an answer is wrong, but where the error occurred.
I do. A student’s working:
Verify: LHS
Locate the error: step (1) to (2) should subtract
Pairs task — find the error and give the correct solution:
Student A
Student B
Student C
Student D
Socratic scaffolding for Student D:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| First, verify their answer. | LHS |
| So an error exists. Where do you look first? | The first step that changes the equation. |
| What did they do from line 1 to line 2? | They added |
| What should line 2 be? | |
| Solve correctly. | |
| Verify the correction. | LHS |
| Looking back | The error was a sign error in collecting terms — the most common kind. |
Answers: A — failed to expand fully; should be
Activity 3 — Inquiry: Which Equation? (8 min)
Pairs. Reverses the usual direction.
Here are four equations:
- Without solving fully, use substitution to decide which of these have
as a solution. - Which have
? Which do not, and what is their solution? - Write two more equations with solution
: one with brackets, one with variables on both sides.
Socratic scaffolding for Q3:
| Prompt | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Understand: what are you building? | An equation you already know the answer to. |
| Start from the answer. What is true? | |
| Now do the same thing to both sides. | Multiply by |
| Again. | Add |
| Check | |
| For a bracket version, work backwards from | |
| For both sides | Start with |
| Looking back | Building an equation is just solving in reverse. |
Answers: 1–2. (i)
Teacher note: all four working is deliberate — it lets students see that many different equations can share a solution, which is exactly why an equation must be checked rather than guessed from its appearance.
Checks for Understanding
(6 minutes — exit ticket, collected)
- Verify whether
solves . Show LHS and RHS separately. - Verify whether
solves . - Find the error in this working and give the correct solution:
- Reasoning. Explain why substituting into the original equation is a better check than re-reading your working.
- Write an equation with solution
that requires two steps to solve.
Answers: 1. LHS
Common Misconceptions
| Misconception | How to pre-empt it |
|---|---|
| Substituting into the simplified equation, so an expansion error survives. | State the rule: always check against the original. |
| Writing a circular check that assumes the answer is right. | Require LHS and RHS to be evaluated separately and only then compared. |
| Concluding “wrong answer” without locating the error. | Every error-hunt answer must name the step and the type of error. |
| Believing verification proves the method was correct. | Verification confirms the answer, not the reasoning — two errors can cancel out. Discuss briefly. |
| Assuming that if the check fails, the equation has no solution. | The equation is fine; the arithmetic was not. Re-solve. |
| Treating a non-whole-number solution as automatically an error. | It may be correct — Year 7 equations usually give whole numbers, but not always. |
Enrichment — Competition-Style Problems
E1 (Kangaroo style). Which of these has
Answer
First:
E2 (AMC Junior style). For what value of
Answer
E3 (Challenge). The equations
Answer
From the second:
E4 (Challenge). A student claims
Answer
LHS
E5 (Challenge). Build three different equations, each with solution
Answer
For example:
Homework
- Verify whether each value is the solution, showing LHS and RHS separately:
(a)
for (b) for (c) for (d) for - Find the error in each and give the correct solution:
(a)
; ; (b) ; ; (c) ; ; (d) ; ; - For what value of
does solve ? - Write an equation with solution
that (a) is one-step (b) is two-step (c) contains brackets. - The equations
and share a solution. Find . - Reasoning. Two students both get
for the same equation, but one made two errors that cancelled out. Does verification detect this? Explain what verification does and does not confirm. - Challenge. For what value of
do the equations and have the same solution?
Answers: Q1 — (a) yes,